The Transgressive Power of the Ludic in Chilean Poetry of the 1970s and 1980s

Review of Maquinarias deconstructivas: Poesía y juego en Juan Luis Martínez, Diego Maquieira y Rodrigo Lira by Marcelo Rioseco (Santiago de Chile: Editorial Cuarto Propio, 2013)

Sovereignty, intervention, and social order in revolutionary times

This article has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form, subsequent to peer review and/or editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Review of International Studies / Volume 39 / Issue 05 / December 2013, pp 1149 - 1167 Copyright © British International Studies Association 2013 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026021051300025

Introduction

The short editorial introduces to the new issue of the Review. Startgin from the 2015 volume, the journal has changed its copyright policy as well as its open access policy

The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?

Recently many editors try to reduce the turnaround times of academic journals. Shorter turnaround times, however, will induce many additional submissions of low-quality papers, increasing significantly the workload of editors and referees, and the number of rejections prior to publication. I suggest several ideas how editors can shorten turnaround times and four ideas how they can still avoid frivolous submissions, thus improving the review process efficiency: higher submission fees; requiring authors to review papers in proportion to their submissions; using differential editorial delay – letting low-quality papers wait more; and banning papers from being submitted after a certain number of rejections.Academic publishing, first response times, editorial process, review process, refereeing

Connecting the dots: Why does what and who came before us matter?

A "Coloring Outside the Lines" editorial column.  A review of organizations who pioneered the involvement of persons of color in park stewardship, outdoor recreation, historic preservation, and other forms of place-based conservation.

Columbia School of Social Work Can Better Support Development of Effective Writing Skills

The Editorial Board of the Columbia Social Work Review holds a firm conviction that social workers must possess advanced written communication skills to serve individuals and communities and advance the field as a whole. To pair this conviction with action, the Board conducted a survey to explore student experiences with writing in graduate studies at Columbia School of Social Work (CSSW). The surveyed students agreed that effective writing skills are imperative for social work professionals, and they overwhelmingly wanted the school to do more to help them develop these skills. Although students highly valued writing, their enthusiasm did not always translate into perceptions of adequate writing instruction, exposure to diverse writing assignments, or adequate institutional support. As editors of a student-run journal, we believe in the value of cogent writing to our field, and we feel compelled to share this student perspective as a contribution to a meaningful discussion on writing at CSSW. This editorial uses student opinion from survey data to underscore the value of critical writing skills to the social work profession, and recommends ways that school supports can be enhanced to match student need. The goal of this editorial is to enrich the scholarly and professional nature of CSSW

The E.C. Green Paper ON Vertical Restraints: Option IV Defended

This paper responds to the editorial in European Competition Law Review, Issue 3, 1998 (The E.C. Green Paper on Vertical Restraints: An Economic Comment). Contrary to the views expressed in that editorial, it is argued that an evaluation of the potentially anti-competitive effects of exclusive distribution and exclusive purchasing-type agreements requires an examination of conditions in both the upstream and downstream markets.